<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gates and M$&#8217; future direction in programming?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cully.biz/2008/02/12/gates-and-m-future-direction-in-programming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cully.biz/2008/02/12/gates-and-m-future-direction-in-programming/</link>
	<description>Data :: Information :: Knowledge :: Power</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SarekOfVulcan</title>
		<link>http://cully.biz/2008/02/12/gates-and-m-future-direction-in-programming/#comment-10682</link>
		<dc:creator>SarekOfVulcan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cully.biz/2008/02/12/gates-and-m-future-direction-in-programming/#comment-10682</guid>
		<description>"But this has not caught on partially because of weak data models -- first Codasyl and then relational. Stronger data models since have emerged, such as rich schemas around XML..."

Of course. Everybody knows that relational databases is what's wrong with programming today...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But this has not caught on partially because of weak data models &#8212; first Codasyl and then relational. Stronger data models since have emerged, such as rich schemas around XML&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course. Everybody knows that relational databases is what&#8217;s wrong with programming today&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
